Wednesday, June 29, 2016

Alex Larson, Entry #2, Time to Work

  Commuting in to New York everyday has really started to take a toll on me. Every morning I wake up at 6:20 to make a 6:55 train which brings me into Newark at 8. From there I have to take another 30 to 40 minute long path train to get to Greenwich Village. So in essence I have a two hour long commute once walking is factored in. The first week I didn’t mind it that much, the hustle and bustle of Newark and New York was almost fun, now it has become more and more boring. Still, being in New York, the hectic city shows you something new every day and being in the city is a very worthwhile experience in and of itself. I am also one of the first ones to get to the lab every morning. I would be very glad to come in later; only problem is that after the 6:55 train there isn’t another one until 9:15, which I did take one time and by the time I got to New York I was the last one into the lab, which was not fun.
            Right now we are just about wrapping up my mini-project on the different types of buffers. We were able to correctly predict several things from our hypothesis but there were other areas that were not correct. For example, the Sodium Borate buffer is able to withstand much higher voltages without heating up, however, when SB was ran parallel to TAE buffer there was no increase in the speed of band migration across the gel. Also, in general, the bands of most of the ladders and samples we tested came back more pronounced and sharper in the Sodium Borate buffer. As for Lithium borate, the first test proved that the solution heats up very fast under high voltage and therefore is not going to satisfy our lab’s demand for quick and accurate gel electrophoresis. We also tried staining the gels using SYBR gold, a ‘cousin’ of SYBR safe used in biotech, through washing it onto and over the gel after being run, and loading it into the solutions on each well before it was run. The better approach was by far loading it into each solution first, and then loading that solution into the wells. From this method, we were able to reduce background staining while providing sharper clearer bands to read overall. I might actually be presenting this to the lab at our next lab meeting, wish me luck.
(Print out of the Gel results: Left LB buffer, Right TAE buffer)
            I am also in the beginning stages for my real summer project. We are working on a new technique called DASH or Depletion of Abundant Sequences through Hybridization. It is very good for sequencing the RNA of specific strains of flu as well as for characterizing the other types of microorganisms (specifically in the respiratory and digestive tracts) during periods of influenza infection and periods without it. For example, if our lab wants to determine what species of bacteria live in a healthy human respiratory system, DASH is very helpful. We know that we can determine the organism by looking at the variable regions in the DNA gene that codes for ribosomal rRNA. We can do this because that gene is conserved throughout basically all organisms, and most of that DNA (16S gene in prokaryotes) is the same across all organisms except for small regions called variable regions, which functionally do not do a whole lot. We can use DASH (through usage of restriction enzymes and/or CRISPR/Cas9) to eliminate all the DNA that is constant, leaving just the variable regions. We then amplify the variable regions using PCR and sequence them. We can then compare them across databases and determine what species of bacteria were present. In short, DASH specifically is very good at making sure we are not amplifying the wrong regions of DNA/RNA and allow us to more accurately isolate the genetic material we want.
(Basic Diagram of DASH)
  

No comments:

Post a Comment