One thing that I didn't mention before about the meta-analysis project is that each paper is screened by two people. The answers are then compared to ensure validity. Any disagreements are settled through communications between the two coders and Dr. Sulik himself. If each paper was only screened by one coder, we would've finished this stage by now, but that would sacrifice the validity of the project, which is crucial in scientific research.
For CSRP, I am still learning data cleaning by watching a lot of youtube videos. I also spent some time last week looking for a website/app to allow assessors of CSRP videochat and sharescreen with participants who have left Chicago. Skype would not work since we are trying to make this as simple as possible for both the assessors and the participants (many assessors are the elderly who are not great with technology). After going through a couple of websites, I found one that's called Zoom that's free and easy to use. I then made a manual for both the assessors and the participants.
Now, my individual project. After discussing with Dr. Sulik, I have decided to research the ways that we can measure our neighborhoods' impact on us. As someone who has moved a lot and lived in many neighborhoods, I have always been interested in the characteristics of neighborhoods and how different neighborhood's can impact people differently. Therefore, in the next three weeks, I will set aside the meta-analysis and work on a literature review of the way people have measured neighborhoods as well as things worth noting when doing so.
No comments:
Post a Comment